Waist To Hip Ratio
Cullum A, McCarthy A, Gunnell D, Davey Smith G, Serne J, Ben-Shlomo Y. Additionally, studies should explore possible training effects (e.g., seeing the video a second time) to ascertain whether it was training effects or other factors (e.g., being observed by technicians) contributing to Jun 2011 · Journal of occupational an...Read nowArticle: Long-term effects of an occupational health guideline on employees' body weight-related outcomes, ca... Table 2⇓ shows the physical characteristics of the entire subject group and the 2 subgroups of subjects.
The relationship between body mass index and waist circumference: implications for estimates of the population prevalence of overweight. In addition, little is known about the reliability of self-measurements over time in any population group . doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.067264. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]15. Convincing evidence indicates that waist circumference and waist-hip circumference ratio are strongly associated with cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, sarcopenic obesity, colorectal and post-menopausal breast cancer, and, in older
Waist To Hip Ratio
doi: 10.1017/S1368980012002741. Diabetes/Metab Res Rev. 2013;29:90–7. Abstract/FREE Full Text ↵ Fujioka S, Matsuzawa Y, Tokunaga K, Tarui S. Legend: Diamond shapes are individual observations calculated as home self-measurement – technician measurement; ...The mean difference between home and technician hip measurements was about one-fifth of an inch.
- Plos One. 2014;9:e107233.
- Because the replicated measurements were taken on the same day for each subject, it is not surprising that the observed reliabilities are higher than are corresponding results reported in other studies
- doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.71. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]23.
- Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 Hayley L.
- The intercept for the fit was -0.0004 m, which is close to the estimated uncertainty in the measurement of distance.
Perini T, de Oliveira G, Ornellas J, de Oliveira F. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.005. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]30. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7:723–7. The results of the regression equations relating body fat mass to WC at each site are shown in Table 6⇓.
doi: 10.1097/00001648-199011000-00009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]8. Scholar Video instructions improve accuracy of self-measures of waist circumference compared with written instructions. Preview this book » What people are saying-Write a reviewWe haven't found any reviews in the usual places.Selected pagesTitle PageTable of ContentsIndexReferencesContentsI1 II9 III19 IV39 V63 VI77 VII93 VIII119 IX151 X171 WC1 We did not experience any difficulties in locating the site below the lowest rib in all subjects, even in obese persons.
Peter received his PhD from the University of New Mexico in 1974.Carl Foster is a professor of exercise and sport science at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse and director of the Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.Home and lab self-measurements were compared to establish test-retest reliability (repeatability of measurements). All participants were advised to follow a hypocaloric diet throughout the study. Reliability was high for all AM (nearly all ICC>0.98).
Reporting standards for Bland-Altman agreement analysis in laboratory research: A cross sectional survey of current practice. Legend: Diamond shapes are individual observations calculated as home self-measurement – technician measurement; ...An examination of the tape measures participants made at home indicated that nearly all followed the online instructions Waist To Hip Ratio J Pakistan Med Assoc. 2012;2012:36–40. [PubMed]26. View this table: In this window In a new window TABLE 4 Reproducibility of waist circumference measurements at the 4 sites for each sex1 The results of the regression equations relating
There were no significant associations between WC and percentage body fat for any of the 4 WC sites in males, but there were significant relations at all 4 sites in females. technician measurements were within the a priori standard for differences and, hence, not deemed clinically meaningful. The plots include the mean difference (also called bias), limits of agreement (LOA, which are 95 % confidence limits for the bias) calculated using the formula for small samples , 95 % tolerance Coqueiro R, Santos M, Neto J, Queiroz B, Bruggar N, Barbosa A.
doi: 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2012.00052.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]27. Including the Tukey mean-difference (Bland-Altman) plot in a statistics course. CrossRefMedline Johnston FE, Wadden TA, Stunkard AJ, et al. Ann Clin Biochem. 2015;52:382–6.
Technical error of measurement in anthropometry, English version. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Linear regression methods were used to model the relation between fat values measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and WC, with separate calculations performed for each of the 4 sites.
Published online 2016 May 4.
hips and thighs), which is associated with metabolic disturbances and cardiovascular risks [12–15].Waist, hip, and neck circumferences are cost-effective, non-invasive, and informative supplementary measurements that could be included on self-report surveys In males, the mean of WC2 was significantly smaller than the means at the other 3 sites, which did not differ significantly from each other. Jamar G, Pisani L, Oyama L, Belote C, Masquio D, Furuya V, Carvalho-Ferreira J, Andrade-Silva S, Damaso A, Caranti D. Conclusions This study has demonstrated a simple, inexpensive method for teaching novice mothers of young children to take their own body circumferences resulting in accurate, reliable data.
Public Health Nutr. 2012;16:281–8. McEneaney DF, Lennie SC. Thus, collecting self-measured and self-reported circumference data in future studies may be a feasible approach in research protocols that has potential to expand our knowledge of body composition beyond that provided Analysis procedures for Bland-Altman plots incorporated the array of reporting standards for agreement analysis in laboratory research .
For epidemiology and intervention studies, including body circumference measurements in self-report surveys could be informative. In both men and women, the narrowest waist circumference (ie, WC2) was significantly smaller than the WC values at the other 3 sites. Thus, to overcome limitations of previous research and ascertain the test-retest reliability and criterion validity of a self-report tool feasible for use in large scale studies, this study compared self-measurements of Validity of a portable glucose, total cholesterol, and triglycerides multi-analyzer in adults.
Changes between 1.8 and 4.1 cm in waist circumference are reported to be clinically relevant in individuals with waist circumferences ranging from 60 to 135 cm . Hillsdale: Erblaum; 1988. 67. The subjects described their ethnicity as follows: 28% were African American, 15% were Asian, 35% were Caucasian, 21% were Hispanic, and 1% were other. The impact of waist circumference on function and physical activity in older adults: longitudinal observational data from the osteoarthritis initiative.
Xie Y, Ho S, Liu Z, Hui S-C. The use of anthropometric and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures to estimate abdominal visceral fat in men and women. The two hip circumferences differences outside the standard differed by 11 and 16 %. Booth et al (15) found that even self-reported WC estimates are useful for monitoring overweight and obesity in epidemiologic surveys.
All statistical calculations were performed with SAS version 8 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) and STATA version 7.0 (STATA Corp, College Station, TX) statistical software packages for personal computers. Also, lines of sight to the ruler scale were as nearly perpendicular to the scale as possible. Estimation of body fat from anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance in Native American children. Clin Chem. 2002;48:799–801. [PubMed]22.
Similarly, studies reporting LOA or SD of mean waist circumference differences thereby permitting LOA calculation, the lower limits ranged from −21.01 to −3.19 cm and the upper range spanned 1.46 to 15.42 cm, As part of a cross-sectional feasibility study, AM of WC, HC and height were assessed twice in 60 participants using a 3D BS (VitussmartXXL). Bland JM, Altman DG. However, few studies have assessed the test-retest reliability and criterion validity of a self-report tool feasible for use in large scale studies.MethodsAt home, mothers of young children viewed a brief, online
© Copyright 2017 nzbsites.com. All rights reserved.